48 years ago, I played tight end on the school football team. In the third quarter of our last game, a nail biter that would determine the state championship, we were one touchdown ahead of the only other undefeated team in our conference, when I wrenched my knee and limped back to the huddle.  

While in our stance before the hike, the trash talk from the other team was all about targeting my injured knee in order to get me out of the game. That very play, all three defensive men in my zone went after my knee…the defensive end, the tackle and the outside linebacker. My teammates, seeing what was happening, issued their own trash talk to the other team to leave me alone, and then proceeded to gang up on the perpetrators. With the protection of my teammates, my knee was no longer singled out for destruction and we went on to win that game and the state championship.

13 years before that game, two years after WWII and shortly after the nations of the world had decided to form a new Jewish state in Palestine called Israel, a group of Arab men, all representatives of their respective country governments, sat in a room in Cairo and dedicated each of their countries to the destruction of the new Jewish state in Palestine. To that end they ordered arms and supplies for their armies and put an Iraqi general in charge of all five armies. His role was to use the armies in a coordinated effort to push the Jews into the sea and in so doing destroy Israel.

At the same time, an arab religious leader in Jerusalem was organizing the arabs in and around Palestine in his own effort to rid the land of the jews. His goal was the same, push the jews into the sea, in other words, the total wiping out of the jews in order to prevent the new jewish state from ever gaining a foothold on the land. His name was Haj Amin Husseini and he was the mufti of Jerusalem. All of Palestine’s Arab men were under his command and willing to die for him.

Both of these organizations were of the opinion that there was only one solution to the Israel situation—the state of Israel must not be allowed to begin, or once begun, not be allowed to survive—and they would use every means at their disposal to see that Israel was destroyed.

Fast forward 62 years to 2009,  the Arabs presently in power in the Mideast feel exactly the same as they did 62 years ago on the eve of the birth of Israel—that Israel has no right to be a state. They simply refuse to accept Jewish sovereignty anywhere in the land of Palestine. According to the scholar, Fouad Ajami, there is no change in the Arab attitudes towards Israel. This is a fact that Obama and his team seem to overlook, or turn a blind eye to. 

During his campaign, Obama stated his desire to sit down with the Mideast leaders and negotiate. And now, during his first 8 months, it seems that he is willing to do more than that—he seems to be messing with the commitments previous administrations have made to Israel. His constant meddling on the subject of building more settlements and his hard line on that issue, and his public position of wanting to negotiate with the Arabs,  has put Israel in a worse position than ever before, and has emboldened the Arabs. The way Arab leaders see it is that America has taken their side, or at least, if that is not an accurate assessment, has stopped standing blindly behind whatever Israel wants to do.

This change has made the situation for Israel very tenuous. If anything, it has made the tinderbox that is Israel/Arab relationships very near the firing point.

My message to Obama and his team is simple—stop all the meddling with the various logistical aspects of the peace process and make a simple statement to the world. Just like my teammates did for me, tell the Arabs—“Mess with Israel and you mess with the United States.”

It is human nature to attack the weak spot of your enemy. Arabs know this, and they see that Israel is now weaker than at any time before. One of the reasons that Israel has prospered and become one of the most successful, prosperous democratic countries in the world is that they have a teammate that was willing to threaten the enemy. If we now appear to not be the strong arm teammate we once were, Arabs will not hesitate to take advantage of the change and attack.

Are we going to have an October surprise, an attack on Iran by either the Bush administration or by Israel to stop the regime from becoming a nuclear power?

It could happen - and alter the dynamics of the presidential race in the blink of an eye - but only if Israel pulls the trigger. Don't expect the United States to drop bombs anytime soon. The reason: Iran has us over a barrel.

According to Britain's Guardian newspaper, Bush earlier this year nixed an Israeli plan to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. Reportedly, the President said no because we couldn't afford Iranian retaliation against our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan or Iran closing down Persian Gulf shipping. Nonetheless, cynical speculation is now swirling in some quarters that with the financial collapse working against McCain - and Bush's legacy coming into focus - the President might reconsider. Could that tail really wag the dog?

Probably not. The fundamental global power dynamics have not changed. Iran has successfully blackmailed us. Iranian Silkworm missiles could close down Gulf oil exports in a matter of minutes, taking about 17 million barrels a day of oil off world markets. Americans could suddenly be looking at the prospect of $10-$12 for a gallon of gas. If the collapse of Wall Street doesn't push us into a depression, that would. And Bush is right: An angered Iran could punish us with thousands of extra casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, as Iranian-trained, armed and funded fighters flow back into the war zones with a vengeance.

So, giving the go ahead to Israel would just not be worth it.

But none of this changes the fact that Israel - on its own, without U.S. complicity - is moving closer to a decision to attack Iran, almost by the day.

What many Americans miss is that Iran is a threat to Israel's very existence, not an imagined danger used by politicians for political advantage. Every Israeli city is within range of Iranian/Hezbollah rockets. To make matters worse, since the July 2006 34-day war, Hezbollah may have as much as trebled the number of rockets it has targeted on Israel.

Meantime, Hezbollah has become the de facto state in Lebanon. And lest we forget, Israel lost that July 2006 war to Hezbollah, pulling its troops out of Lebanon without having obtained a single objective. In other words, Israel no longer has its deterrence credibility, the fear that it can decisively retaliate against its enemies.

Israel knows that international diplomacy against Iran up until now has been a farce. Iran called Bush's bluff, ignored sanctions and continued its nuclear program with impunity. And if the Israelis needed another psychological kick in the pants, last week North Korea announced that it is back to building a bomb, likewise with impunity.

Finally, Israel has to calculate that American influence around the world is on the wane. Americans are tired of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And now, after the war in Georgia, Russia is opening up its flow of weapons to Iran.

Couple all of this with Israel's suspicion that Iran is within only a few short years of having a nuclear bomb, and Israel knows time is not on its side. It is starting to believe that it has no choice but to change its fortunes with arms.

This much is certain. Whether the President is named Bush, McCain or Obama, he will either have to prepare for war in the Gulf or find a way to bring Iran back into the nation-state system. The day of reckoning is near.

I myself think a deal can be cut with Iran. During the last 30 years, Iran has gone from a terrorist, revolutionary power to far more rational, calculating regional hegemon. Its belligerence today has more to do with a weakened United States and Israel than with any plans to start World War III.

The question is what price Iran would exact for a settlement. Or more to the point: Would we prefer to take our chances with an Israeli surprise?

Baer, a former CIA case officer, is author of the just-released "The Devil We Know: Dealing with the New Iranian Superpower."

America has one major weakness. This weakness goes beyond the commander in chief and the military leadership. Every single one of us in the western world has this weakness and it may be the downfall of our civilization as we know it.

To understand what this weakness is, go back 64 years to early December 1944.  The Allies, poised on the German border, were re-supplying themselves, resting from some horrible battles, and generally leaving the Germans alone for the winter. 

Early one frosty morning Ike invited Omar Bradley to his headquarters to discuss the allied situation along the front. Between the two of them, two of the best logical military minds our country has ever produced…between the two of them, they decided, after reviewing the whole situation and much discussion, that even though the Americans were weak at the Ardennes Forest section of the front, Hitler would never mount a counterattack through the Ardennes because the forest presented almost impossible conditions.   

Eisenhower knew that the Germans could not supply and support a major offensive on the winter roads in the Ardennes. Additionally, Eisenhower and Bradley felt that the newly formed Volksgrenadier divisions were not capable of offensive action in the winter. And thirdly, they knew, as military commanders, that the German military leadership knew how risky an offensive through the Ardennes would be. They knew that it would open the German army up for complete annihilation from the sides. So, at the end of the day, they both agreed that it would be a strategic mistake for the Germans to counter attack through the Ardennes.

Both Eisenhower and Bradley were absolutely correct. Their thinking was militarily sound. And every German officer on the other side of the Ardennes agreed with them. There was only one problem. Hitler did not agree with them. Eisenhower’s major error, which cost the Allies thousands of casualties, was that he did not take into account that the leader of Germany was a crazy, desperate lunatic. If he had looked at the situation from Hitler’s point of view, he would have come to a different conclusion.

What is the lesson in this 64 year old story? It is that we cannot make any conclusions about the enemies plans without understanding that they are crazy. Crazy with desperation, crazy with commitment to our destruction, crazy with hate…. If we do not begin to get inside the insanity of those that are trying to kill us, we will never be able to defend ourselves from their attacks.

I hope our military leadership knows this. I hope there are defensive plans out there built on the premise that our enemies are lunatics.  I hope Israel understands this point.  I hope there are agencies getting inside the heads of the leaders of Iran, North Korea, China, Hezbollah...well, you get the picture.  If not, well...Silence of the Lambs on a global scale….

God Help Us.