About Me

Name: The Chopping Block
Location: Piscataway, NJ
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

America's Weak Point

 

America has one major weakness. This weakness goes beyond the commander in chief and the military leadership. Every single one of us in the western world has this weakness and it may be the downfall of our civilization as we know it.

To understand what this weakness is, go back 64 years to early December 1944.  The Allies, poised on the German border, were re-supplying themselves, resting from some horrible battles, and generally leaving the Germans alone for the winter. 

Early one frosty morning Ike invited Omar Bradley to his headquarters to discuss the allied situation along the front. Between the two of them, two of the best logical military minds our country has ever produced…between the two of them, they decided, after reviewing the whole situation and much discussion, that even though the Americans were weak at the Ardennes Forest section of the front, Hitler would never mount a counterattack through the Ardennes because the forest presented almost impossible conditions.   

Eisenhower knew that the Germans could not supply and support a major offensive on the winter roads in the Ardennes. Additionally, Eisenhower and Bradley felt that the newly formed Volksgrenadier divisions were not capable of offensive action in the winter. And thirdly, they knew, as military commanders, that the German military leadership knew how risky an offensive through the Ardennes would be. They knew that it would open the German army up for complete annihilation from the sides. So, at the end of the day, they both agreed that it would be a strategic mistake for the Germans to counter attack through the Ardennes.

Both Eisenhower and Bradley were absolutely correct. Their thinking was militarily sound. And every German officer on the other side of the Ardennes agreed with them. There was only one problem. Hitler did not agree with them. Eisenhower’s major error, which cost the Allies thousands of casualties, was that he did not take into account that the leader of Germany was a crazy, desperate lunatic. If he had looked at the situation from Hitler’s point of view, he would have come to a different conclusion.

What is the lesson in this 64 year old story? It is that we cannot make any conclusions about the enemies plans without understanding that they are crazy. Crazy with desperation, crazy with commitment to our destruction, crazy with hate…. If we do not begin to get inside the insanity of those that are trying to kill us, we will never be able to defend ourselves from their attacks.

I hope our military leadership knows this. I hope there are defensive plans out there built on the premise that our enemies are lunatics.  I hope Israel understands this point.  I hope there are agencies getting inside the heads of the leaders of Iran, North Korea, China, Hezbollah...well, you get the picture.  If not, well...Silence of the Lambs on a global scale….

God Help Us.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mark Twain Was Right

"It is wiser to find out than to suppose."  The old man was right, and he wasn't even talking about our commander in chief and the military commanders.  Let me take you back 60 odd plus years ago for a moment.
 
In December of 1944 the Allies had reached the German border in their push to clear Europe of Hitler. All along the Siegfried line, American troops dug in and prepared for the final assault on German troops. The only problem was that there was absolutely no reliable intelligence about what was going on inside the German Army. All intelligence sources had dried up. No more French underground, no Belgium sympathizers, no more listening in on radio conversations.  Once inside their own borders, the Germans used secure telephone lines rather than their radios. The allies were blind and deaf.

But stupidly, (knowing they had no intelligence), the intelligence gurus sent their intelligence reports up to the top military commanders, and even more stupidly, (knowing there was no intelligence), the top military commanders read the intelligence reports and believed them. 

On Dec 16, 1944, 21st Army Group’s intelligence summary read—“The enemy … cannot stage major offensive operations.” The only problem was that on that very day, Germany was attacking the American lines at the Ardennes forest with the biggest, strongest offensive push they had ever used against the American forces. In what was to become known as the Battle of the Bulge, the Americans were caught completely off guard and suffered tremendous losses as the Germans pushed their way westward towards the Atlantic port of Antwerp.

Even during the battle itself, the top commanders refused to believe the reports coming from the field because they ran counter to the intelligence reports that were in their hands. Shortly before dawn on Dec 16, Lt Bouck, commander of the intelligence and reconnaissance platoon, upon seeing the tanks, artillery and infantry columns marching towards his position, radioed headquarters with the information. The officer in the rear refused to believe him and did not supply the artillery bombardment that Bouck asked for. He did not believe him because his intelligence report stated that the Germans could not mount an offensive attack.
 
Now jump forward 64 years to the report out of Senator John Rockefeller's Select Committee on Intelligence and read where it says that our nations intelligence agencies generally substantiated that the following were true:
 
1.  Iraq had a nuclear weapons program
2.  Iraq had the capability to produce biological weapons
3.  Iraq had chemical weapons
4.  Iraq had weapons of mass destruction
5.  Iraq had delivery systems such as ballistic missles
6.  Iraq had unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to deliver weapons of mass destruction
7.  Iraq supported terrorits groups other than al Qaeda
8.  Iraq provided safe haven for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
9.  Iraq was in contact with al Qaeda
 
As we now know, or substantially believe, none of the above turned out to be true.  Yet it is not a case of our commander in chief lying to us.  It is a case of our national intelligence agencies failing to provide the information we neede to make the correct decisions.  Was our commander in chief absolved?  Of course not.  His problem is that he wanted so much to believe it, he did not question it when it came in.  If Bush had read any Mark Twain while he was at Yale, he might have known that is wiser to find out rather to suppose.  Especially when committing our troops to war.
 
All of this really worries me.  In a day and age when we should be able to know everything about everyone, including everything our enemies are doing, it appears that it is just the opposit.  We know nothing.  And knowing nothing leads to supposing and assuming, and our record on that is dismal.
 
Just wait till the war with China comes over Taiwan.  Once they technologically destroy our whole computerized operation, we will be just like the soldiers at Ardennes in 1944...blind and deaf.  But add one more trait to that...dumb.
 
God Save Us.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »